With so much evidence supporting the flat Earth theory, why aren't more resources dedicated to studying it?

Your only defense against those claims is to yell “FAKE” or “CONSPIRACY”…but without any real reason why anyone would fake it - or what the conspiracists have to gain from this insanely difficult set of operations.

We have photos of the round earth taken by many hundreds of satellites - owned by many different governments AND by many companies AND (with “cubesats”) by kids in college.

This is direct evidence. No complicated thinking-about-it things to worry your tiny brains.

Win a signed pink cycling jersey of Giro winner Simon Yates - Team Visma

There’s a reason for that - it is literally, mathematically and geometrically impossible to do that other than on a sphere.

No Flat Earther has EVER explained the motion of the Sun and Moon around their flat earth model that can explain sunrise and sunset times all around the world.

We have several hundred people who flew to space and saw it with their own eyes.

France blown away! Records sent tumbling as Les Bleus concede five goals for the first time in 56 YEARS against incredible Spain - Goal.com

No Flat Earther has EVER explained how a simple magnetic compass works in the southern hemisphere (or the region beyond the equatorial circle in their own maps).

Just one person (like me) can provide at least two dozen disproofs of the Flat Earth - and at least another two dozen consequences that we’d EASILY be able to spot if the Earth was actually flat.

Now - there is NO piece of so-called evidence that you can provide that I cannot disprove. Try it. Post a piece of so-called flat-earth evidence in comments below - and I can single-handedly disprove it.

What would happen if the Soviet Union had simply annexed Manchuria after World War 2 or kept it independent as a puppet state allied them and separate from China as China was too weak too oppose it anyway?

Because this “evidence” that you imagine simply doesn’t exist - and yet the amount of evidence (indeed PROOF) that it’s nonsense is an enormous mountain:

So - there you go. Two disproofs that no flat earther can explain.

To pick just two things:

From an axiology/value theory point of view, how can one say that a diverse society is better than a uniform one, especially given the negative effects of diversity (racism, sectarian conflict, problems arising from extreme cultural relativism)?